A principal
prosecution witness recalled by a Lagos High Court sitting in Ikeja, in the
on-going trial of former managing director of Bank PHB, Francis Atuche, on
Monday, March 4, 2013, disowned a resolution of Future View Securities Limited’s
board purportedly presented as evidence of a request for a loan from the
defunct Bank PHB (now Keystone Bank). The witness, Mrs. Elizabeth Ebi,
explained to the court that her company, Future View Securities Limited never
pass a resolution requesting a loan from the defunct bank.
Under
cross-examination by counsel to the first defendant, Tayo Oyetibo, SAN, Ebi
told the court that the purported resolutions did not emanate from any of the
companies so claimed by the defendants. “This is not Future View Securities
Limited letter head paper, there is no RC number on that paper. Our resolutions
states company’s directors and designation and I don’t see it here; the address
and information at the bottom is not our e-mail address and not our web
address. Besides, we don’t make general resolution, our resolutions have
specifics and this resolution is not targeted at a specific matter. No
resolution was signed by Future View Securities Limited to Bank PHB for
any loan”, she pointed out.
Mrs. Ebi also
told the court that the dates on the purported resolutions indicated that the
documents were signed two days after she made her statement at the EFCC office
and also added “the documents were signed 25 January, 2008, which is much later
than the purported loan date which was early January, 2008”.
Ebi’s denial came
in the wake of a subpoena, seeking clarifications on the claims that board
resolutions of three companies indicated interests in a loan from Bank PHB. The
companies are: Future View Securities Limited; Extra Oil Limited and Integrated
Services Limited.
Mr.
Samuel Ekanem, Acting Chief compliant officer of the Keystone Bank, presented
three documents to the court, which the defence counsel told the court were board
resolutions of Future View Securities Limited; Extra Oil Limited ; Integrated
Services Limited , and tendered same as exhibits before the court. The court
admitted the three documents as exhibits.
It would be
recalled that during the last sitting of the court on January 28, 2013, the
defence made an application for the recall of two principal witnesses, which
the court granted and the witnesses were recalled. The recalled witness: Mr.
Diamond Uju and Mrs. Elizabeth Ngozi Ebi were again cross-examined on issues
relating to the exhibits. Uju and Ebi both denied appending their
signatures on the documents tendered as exhibits. On the score of this, Oyetibo
immediately made an application to the court for Uju to sign three times on a
sheet of paper, while Ebi was made to sign four times on a sheet of paper,
which the defence tendered and the court admitted same as exhibit.
The
submissions of Uju and Ebi eventually led to the closure of the prosecution
case but the defence sued for more time to make a formal application for a no
-case submission for the third defendant, Mr. Ugo Anyanwu. Justice Okunnu
adjourned proceedings till April 7, 2013 which allowed for both the defence and
prosecution to file all their applications and make responses respectively.
Atuche
and two others are standing trial over a N25billion theft case instituted
against them by the EFCC. The two other defendants in the case are:
Elizabeth Atuche and Ugo Anyanwu.
No comments:
Post a Comment