Justice Fadawu Umar of the Borno State High Court, Maiduguri
on November 13, 2018 dismissed an application filed by Kabir Bello and Musa Buba
Amshi challenging the jurisdiction of the court to try them, and the power of
the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, to prosecute them.
Bello, a retired Assistant Director, Public Affairs
Directorate of the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, is alleged
to have connived with Jumai Lawal and Amshi (serving officials of INEC) to
collect slush funds from a former Minister of Petroleum Resources, Diezani
Alison-Madueke, in the build-up to the 2015 presidential election. They are
facing an amended six-count charge for the offence of “criminal conspiracy
to procure benefits for public officers and corrupt receipt of monetary
benefits”.
Zanna Hamza, counsel to the defendants had on October 24,
2017 raised an objection citing sections 138 (1b), 149, 150(1&2) of the
Electoral Act 2010 as amended respectively.
He said: “My lord, Section 149 of the Electoral Act says, the Commission (INEC) shall consider any recommendation made to it by a tribunal with respect to the prosecution of any person for any offence disclosed in any election petition.”
He said: “My lord, Section 149 of the Electoral Act says, the Commission (INEC) shall consider any recommendation made to it by a tribunal with respect to the prosecution of any person for any offence disclosed in any election petition.”
Hamza argued that the charges against his clients were “not
based on election petition”.
Prosecuting counsel, Khalid Sanusi, however countered the argument stating
that: “According to section 138 (1b) of the Electoral Act, a candidate can
question the validity of the election by reasons of corrupt practices after the
election. We are not questioning the election, therefore the said section is
not relevant.”
Sanusi urged the court to take judicial notice of the
offence charged under the ICPC Act 2000, which gives jurisdiction to the High
court to try offences provided in section 6(3).
Furthermore, he added that the prosecution was also based on
section 7(2f)
of the EFCC Establishment Act, 2004.
While delivering his ruling, Justice Umar held that: “From
the brief of facts filed, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC,
is not challenging the validity of the election of 2015. Therefore, the court
has jurisdiction to determine the case.”
The trial judge, thereafter ordered the defendants to open
their defence on November 30, 2018.
No comments:
Post a Comment