Vladimir Putin yesterday issued a thinly-veiled threat to arm Iran with missile defences if the West attacks Syria.
The
Russian leader said Moscow had provided elements of the S-300 military
technology to Syria but had frozen further shipments, suggesting they
could be routed elsewhere.
That
was widely seen as a threat to revive a contract for delivery of the
S-300s to Iran, which Russia cancelled several years ago under strong US
and Israeli pressure.
Warning the West: Putin sought to downplay the
current chill in the U.S.-Russian relations and said that the two
countries need to cooperate on a range of issues in the interests of
global stability
Assisting the enemy: The U.S. says Russia has
provided military support to Assad that has allowed him to cling to
power during Syria's roughly 2-year-long civil war
Mr Putin’s intervention came
ahead of a G20 summit he is hosting today in St Petersburg, in which he
is expected to hold a difficult one-to-one meeting with David Cameron.
The
S-300 system, which targets aircraft, cruise and ballistic missiles,
would make military attempts to stop Iran building a nuclear bomb all
but impossible without a ground invasion.
Syria’s deputy foreign minister,
Faisal Muqdad, said it would take ‘every measure’ if hit by a US-led
military strike and would never give in, even if it led to ‘World War
Three’.
But Mr Cameron
told MPs there was a risk of a ‘Armageddon’ for the people of Syria if
the use of chemical weapons went unpunished.
He suggested Labour and other opponents of military action were ‘letting down’ the people of Syria.
Mr Putin suggested he might back
intervention in the UN Security Council if it was proved ‘beyond doubt’
that President Assad ordered a gas attack that killed 1,500 people,
including hundreds of children, last month.
But
diplomatic sources said that despite ‘overwhelming’ evidence against
Assad, Russia was considering publishing a dossier seeking to blame
rebel forces trying to topple the regime for the attack.
Mr
Putin said it was ‘too early’ to talk about what Russia would do if the
US attacked Syria without UN backing, adding: ‘We have our ideas about
what we will do and how we will do it in case the situation develops
toward the use of force or otherwise. We have our plans.’
The
Russian leader called the S-300 air defence missile system ‘a very
efficient weapon’ and said Russia had a contract for its delivery to
Syria.
United front: Obama speaks flanked by House leader of the Republicans, John Boehner - but many congressmen are still undecided
‘We have supplied some of the components, but the delivery hasn’t been completed,’ he said. ‘We have suspended it for now.
‘But
if we see that steps are taken that violate the existing international
norms, we shall think how we should act in the future, in particular
regarding supplies of such sensitive weapons to certain regions of the
world.’
In another
significant escalation of tensions in the Middle East, Russia dispatched
a large missile cruiser to the Mediterranean.
The
cruiser, Moskva, will be joined by a destroyer from Russia’s Baltic
fleet and a frigate from the Black Sea fleet, tasked with ‘protecting
national interests’.
Mr
Cameron insisted it would be ‘very perilous’ for the US to follow
Britain’s example and step back from plans to hit Damascus in response
to chemical weapons attacks, but he again told MPs that Britain will not
take part in military action following last week’s Commons vote.
Proof: Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has challenged the U.S. and France to prove he used chemical weapons
History: Russia has sent legislators to the U.S. before to try to persuade Congress about pending legislation
dailymail.co.uk
No comments:
Post a Comment