President
Goodluck Jonathan’s decision to consider amnesty for members of the
Islamic fundamentalist sect, Boko Haram, is not sitting well with the
military high command, SUNDAY PUNCH has gathered.
Jonathan, on Thursday, had set up a committee to consider the possibility of granting amnesty to Boko Haram members.
Our correspondents gathered that senior
military officials at the defence headquarters viewed the committee as a
“political move” that would not solve the insecurity plaguing the
nation.
A cross-section of the military top
echelons told our correspondents that they had yet to receive an
instruction from the President to stop operations in the northern states
where Boko Haram is wreaking havoc.
According to them, since they only read
about the committee on the pages of newspapers, it is not sufficient for
them to halt their operations.
Confirming this, the Defence
Headquarters said even though it would back any decision taken by the
Federal Government, it had yet to get directives from relevant
authorities to cease fire.
Speaking, in a telephone conversation
with one of our correspondents, the Director of Information, Brig. Gen.
Chris Olukolade, noted that the setting up of the committee on amnesty
for Boko Haram would not affect the operations of the Joint Task Force
involved in internal security operations in the North-East.
“The status quo will remain until
further directives are given. The JTF has a responsibility to maintain
the peace and the usual vigilance to sustain the tempo of operations,”
he said.
Olukolade added that the Armed Forces
would continue to give the expected support to the government to
surmount the security challenges in the country.
He said, “The Nigerian Armed Forces will completely back any position taken by the Federal Government on this subject.
“The military will work towards
effective realisation of the ultimate decision of government on the
issue of tackling the nation’s security challenges without any
equivocation whatsoever.”
Meanwhile, there is growing anger within
the rank and file of the military as a result of the decision by the
Federal Government to consider granting amnesty to the extremist sect.
SUNDAY PUNCH learnt that the
Joint Task Force comprising security personnel from the armed forces,
the State Security Service and the Nigerian Customs believed that
granting amnesty to the sect could have far-reaching negative security
implications.
Security officers, who also spoke on the
condition of anonymity, expressed reservations over the Federal
Government’s decision, which they described as ill-advised and a “pat on
the back for the sect.”
They stressed that the sect members were
very rigid and not amenable to “soft talk” and insisted that the
government should resist undue political pressure, adding that
negotiation with terrorists rarely yielded positive results.
TA soldier working in one of the
troubled northern states said since the Chief of Army Staff, Lt. Gen.
Azubuike Ihejirika, had not asked them to stop going after members of
the sect, they won’t drop their weapons.
he soldier, who pleaded anonymity out of
fear of victimisation said, “We are just getting this information from
the papers; we have not heard anything from the Chief of Army Staff or
from the army headquarters. But I must tell you that soldiers here are
not happy and they are grumbling seriously against any plan to consider
amnesty for these people. Do you know how many people they have killed?
This is purely politics and it will have bad effects on the security of
this country. We are against this amnesty thing.
“The situation is even more precarious
because some of the people championing the cause of the planned amnesty
for Boko Haram might have links with international terror networks.”
Another security official, who pleaded
anonymity for the same reason, said amnesty for Boko Haram would not
work because many of the sect members that were arrested in the past and
placed under a “de-radicalisation and perception management” programme
by the State Security Service still went back to violence after they
were released.
“The President might have been misled
into considering granting amnesty for Boko Haram by his advisers, who
probably want to placate the northern political establishment. From a
broad point of view, it is an ill-advised decision which could backfire
and leave the national security more vulnerable than before.
“Amnesty for Niger Delta militants is
not the same as the one being considered for Boko Haram terrorists whose
only goal was the total islamisation of the country,” a senior police
officer said.
Earlier, Ihejirika had ruled out
immediate negotiation with the Boko Haram sect because of what he termed
the “ “insincere nature of the group.”
The Army Chief, who spoke at an
interactive session on military/media relations in Lagos, last week, had
said the sect could not be trusted to hold genuine talks with
government.
He had said, “These are people that
would be talking about peace in the morning and before you would say
good afternoon, the same people calling for truce are attacking and
killing innocent people with bombs and guns.
“The Federal Government has in several
instances pleaded with the group to come to the roundtable for peace
talks but it never showed up.
“Let those people calling for amnesty
for the group start peace talks with them. If they are able to get the
group together, then, government would assess the situation and may
consider another way of handling the situation.”
Jonathan’s committee on amnesty for Boko
Haram was set up on Thursday after a marathon five-hour meeting between
the President, the military high command and other security services at
the Presidential Villa, Abuja.
The committee, whose members have yet to
be named, was mandated to consider the propriety of granting pardon to
the sect, take an inventory of the calls by various groups advocating
amnesty for the sect, and to come up with the modalities for granting
such an amnesty if it became a necessity.
PUNCH
No comments:
Post a Comment