Popoola |
The angry
man, Mr. Adebayo Popoola, explained that the bank sold a property to him,
knowing full well that it was used as collateral by one of its customers and
that the date of expiration given to the customer on the property was not yet due.
Since the
property, a bungalow, has become enveloped in crisis, Popoola had withdrawn
from further transaction and possession of the property. He had asked the bank to refund his N5
million, but the bank allegedly refused; rather it sued him, the police and the
owner of the property to court for harrassement and intimidation.
Popoola
believed that the bank’s game plan is to frustrate him and delay payment of his
money.
Popoola
said: “I bought a property, located at Goriola Street from an agent, Mr. Ibrahim.
He took me round properties under his care and I finally settled for the one
located at No. 3, Goriola Street. Ibrahim told me that First Bank Microfinance
owned the property. The bank said the property was N10 million, but it was a
rundown building. It was abandoned from the look of it. But we finally settled
for N6.5 million. Ibrahim gave me an account number, which I paid the money
into.
“Ibrahim and
my lawyer said that I should pay N5million into the account and bring N1.5
million cash to Ibrahim. After the payment, they gave me a Survey Plan and Deed
of Assignment between the former owner and the person who bought the property
from the former owner.”
Popoola went
home to celebrate, believing that the deal was stamped and sealed.
A month
later, he went with his kid brother to inspect the building. He later left his
brother to go and eat. He was still eating when he received a call a frantic
call from his brother, explaining that a woman brought police to the site to
arrest him for trespassing.
Popoola ran
to Ajeromi Police Station, Ajegunle, where he met one Mrs. Doris Mukoro, who
presented herself as the owner of the property, accusing Popoola of trespassing
and damaging her property.
The case was
transferred to Apapa Police Command, but Popoola who felt he had been
defrauded, petitioned the Special Fraud Unit (SFU), Ikoyi, for further
investigation.
The case was
still undergoing investigation, when the bank went to the court and got an
order restraining the police from further investigation.
Before
police stopped investigation, it had retrieved about N1.260 million for Popoola
from the agent and lawyer who shared the commission on the sale of the
property.
“I later got
to understand that the owner of the property, used it as collateral, but the
bank didn’t wait for the time of the collateral to elapse before it sold the
property to me,” said Popoola.
He continued:
“The bank sold to me in May, but the expiration date for the woman’s collateral
was supposed to be August. Investigators told me that even after August, the
bank needed to have given the woman two more months before taking action on the
property.
“My lawyer
told me that the bank was also supposed to publish in newspapers that it was
selling, but it didn’t do that! All I want now is for the bank to give me my N5
million. I have incurred a lot of loss since the matter started.”
When our journalist
visited the bank, it refused to say anything relating to the matter. Rather the
bank’s staff, who spoke, refused to give their names. According to them, they couldn’t
react to wild allegations leveled against the bank, stressing: “If a customer
has a problem with us, let the customer come to us or seek redress in court.”
The SFU
spokesperson, Mrs. Ngozi Isintume-Agu, confirming the story, alleged that the
bank wrote a Letter of Consent by itself and gave to Mrs. Mukoro’s mother (the
co-owner of the property), to sign and the woman had signed, unaware of what
she was signing.
She added:
“The collateral was supposed to expire September, but the bank sold the
property before then. The bank has now sued police to court. The matter is now
in court. Maybe when the matter is struck out, police will continue with its
investigation.”
Stating her
own side of the story, Mrs. Mukoro, a cold room operator, said that she
borrowed N3.5 million in December 2012 and that she used to remit N30, 000
every day to the bank, until she travelled.
According to
her, she paid from January to February, but defaulted towards February ending.
She said: “I
travelled. When the bank insisted that I should continue paying every day, I
went to a lawyer. He said I should look for developers. We went to the bank
with the developer, but met a new manager.
“I asked for
the statement of account, so that I could know what was left to remit, but they
refused to attend to us. My lawyer later gave me letter to the branch office,
at boundary, Ajegunle, which was my branch, but the staff there refused to
collect the letter. This was happening in May, 2013.”
She said
that it was on July, 3, that she discovered strangers traipsing round her
property and alerted police. “The loan was supposed to expire on September
2013, but the bank sold the property in May. My mum didn’t sign any Letter of
Consent! My mum can’t even read! I’ve asked her severally, but she said she
didn’t sign anything. I believe the document was forged.”
In the suit
filed by the bank against the Police, Mrs. Mukoro, her mother (Mrs. Alice) and
Popoola, the bank demands compensatory general damage of N10 million for the
unlawful violation of the bank’s staff fundamental rights. The Suit also wants
no further arrest of the applicants pending the hearing and determination of
the suit, stressing that the case was civil and not criminal.
According to
the suit, on November, 12, 2012, Mrs. Doris Mukoro, requested for a loan
facility of N3.5 million from the bank which was granted on December, 21.
Mrs. Mukoro
mortgaged the property co-owned with her mother.
The suit
further states that Mrs. Mukoro’s mother, Mrs. Alice, issued a Letter of
Consent to the bank, consenting to Mrs. Mukoro’s use of the property as a
security for her loan.
It further states:
“Alice and Mukoro further issued a Power of Attorney in favour of the bank in
respect of the security and Mukoro signed a Loan Agreement.”
According to
the documents, Mukoro was supposed to repay the loan on weekly installments of
N132, 000 for eight months, but she paid for three installments and stopped
paying.
The document
said that a letter was written to her, calling off the loan and informing her
that it wanted to exercise the rights as contained in the Power of Attorney.
On April,
23, another letter of reminder was sent to her.
“That
pursuant to the Power of Attorney donated to us, we disposed the security to
one Mr. Adebayo Popoola…that the police at SFU are now forcing us to refund the
sum of N3.5 million to Popoola or face a trumped up charge in a criminal court
in matter that is totally civil,” states the suit.
In one of
the bank’s document, it showed that Mrs. Mukoro and her mother are both
illiterate and the business transaction between them and the bank was
interpreted to them in Pidgin English by one Fakoya Dotun. Another document
showed Alice, appending signature with a thumb print.
In the Loan
Agreement document, it states: “Provided that upon default by the Borrower to
repay her loan facility, the company shall be at liberty and without further
notice to Borrower and/or the Guarantor(s) to fully complete the Borrower
and/or the Guarantor(s) cheque(s) by filling in the current date and
outstanding indebtedness of the Borrower and present same to the relevant Bank
of the Borrower and/or Guarantor for payment of the outstanding indebtedness on
the Borrower’s loan facility.”
No comments:
Post a Comment