Olisa Metuh, a former
spokesperson of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, will know his fate on
February 23, 2017 as to whether the Federal High Court Abuja, will release his
international passport for him to seek medical attention outside of the
country.
Metuh, who is standing trial along
with Destra Investment Limited on a seven-count charge bordering on money
laundering, will also know whether the court will grant his prayers urging the
court to subpoena Col. Sambo Dasuki (retd), from whom he is accused to have
received N400million while he was National Security Adviser, as he would not be
able to proceed with his defence, without Dasuki taking the witness box.
It would be recalled that Onyeachi
Ikpeazu, SAN, counsel for Metuh had on May 23, 2016 through a previous
application dated May 16, 2016 made a similar application seeking the
permission of the court to allow his client "travel to the United Kingdom
for five weeks to attend to his failing health".
The presiding judge, Justice Okon
Abang, however dismissed that application.
At the sitting today, Ikpeazu in
moving the application, argued that "this application is distinct"
from the earlier one, noting that, "this is a prayer for variation in
bail condition", and "bordered on the life and health of the
defendant".
He further argued that it wanted the
court to subpoena Dasuki, because "without his testimony the entire
defence has no foundation to rest and we didn't go to NSA to remove money from
them".
Justice Abang, however asked him if
he had called all the other witnesses the defence had forwarded to the court to
which Ikpeazu answered, "No, I have not".
Prosecution counsel, Silvanus Tahir,
advanced arguments contained in his 15 paragraph counter affidavit vehemently
opposing the request for Metuh's international passport to be released to him
and urged the court to "dismiss the application and instead sustain the
tempo of the trial or order a most speedy trial".
After listening to the arguments,
Justice Abang ruled that: "Ruling will be delivered on 23rd February, 2017
on whether these applications subsist or either of them, or in the event they
are overruled, then the defence will be at liberty to call further evidence in
this matter".
No comments:
Post a Comment